Box counting: investigate a pattern
An adaptable assignment for learning to measure, graph and question a result.
SME teaching draft. Not classroom-tested or externally reviewed. The worked example is a reproduction of a known construction.
At a glance
- Learning goals
- Define a counting rule; make a labeled table and graph; explain how a measurement depends on a method.
- Materials
- Squared paper and a pencil. A spreadsheet or short script is optional for larger grids.
- Suggested time
- Two 45-minute sessions, with the teacher adjusting scope for readiness.
- Deliverable
- One page containing a question, method, results table, figure and a statement of limits.
Learner instructions
- Make the pattern. Divide a square into nine equal squares and leave the center empty. Repeat within each remaining square. Draw the first two stages on squared paper.
- Define a measurement. State the grid size, what you count as occupied and how you align your counting grid. Count the occupied squares at each stage.
- Keep a record. Record stage, side length in cells, occupied squares and your rule. Keep corrections visible.
- Show the result. Make a labeled table and figure. Explain the pattern in your own words.
- Question the method. Compare your result with the worked example. Explain one reason a count could change without the underlying pattern changing.
- Credit and reflect. Cite the example, identify help received and describe one thing you would check next.
For a larger analysis, use the six-scale example data and its figure. Label supplied data as supplied; do not describe them as your own observations.
Adapt the challenge
- First investigation
- Draw two stages, count carefully, compare ratios and explain the rule. Logarithms are not required.
- High school
- Reproduce the aligned box counts and log–log slope. Compare shifted-grid counts and explain the finite-grid difference.
- College / independent study
- Compare depths and offsets, justify scale selection and report residuals or uncertainty. A new analysis must be distinguished from the supplied example.
Suggested assessment
For each criterion, use 0 = absent, 1 = partly explained, 2 = clear and supported. Maximum 8 points; adapt before assigning.
- Method
- The rule, grid and alignment are sufficiently clear for another learner to repeat.
- Evidence
- Counts, calculations and any supplied data are traceable and labeled.
- Communication
- The table, figure and explanation agree; axes and units or scale are clear.
- Interpretation
- The conclusion stays within the evidence and identifies a limitation or useful next check.
Use a short feedback session before the final version.
Credit and reuse
This assignment’s original instructions and rubric are offered by SME under CC BY 4.0. Credit “SME, Box counting: investigate a pattern, version 1 (2026)” and identify changes. Linked materials retain their own source and license information.
Prepare your adapted teaching resource or learner’s project. Publishing a student’s work requires its own permissions.