Box counting: investigate a pattern

An adaptable assignment for learning to measure, graph and question a result.

Mathematics & data · middle school to college · two suggested sessions · version 1, October 29, 2026

SME teaching draft. Not classroom-tested or externally reviewed. The worked example is a reproduction of a known construction.

At a glance

Learning goals
Define a counting rule; make a labeled table and graph; explain how a measurement depends on a method.
Materials
Squared paper and a pencil. A spreadsheet or short script is optional for larger grids.
Suggested time
Two 45-minute sessions, with the teacher adjusting scope for readiness.
Deliverable
One page containing a question, method, results table, figure and a statement of limits.

Learner instructions

  1. Make the pattern. Divide a square into nine equal squares and leave the center empty. Repeat within each remaining square. Draw the first two stages on squared paper.
  2. Define a measurement. State the grid size, what you count as occupied and how you align your counting grid. Count the occupied squares at each stage.
  3. Keep a record. Record stage, side length in cells, occupied squares and your rule. Keep corrections visible.
  4. Show the result. Make a labeled table and figure. Explain the pattern in your own words.
  5. Question the method. Compare your result with the worked example. Explain one reason a count could change without the underlying pattern changing.
  6. Credit and reflect. Cite the example, identify help received and describe one thing you would check next.

For a larger analysis, use the six-scale example data and its figure. Label supplied data as supplied; do not describe them as your own observations.

Adapt the challenge

First investigation
Draw two stages, count carefully, compare ratios and explain the rule. Logarithms are not required.
High school
Reproduce the aligned box counts and log–log slope. Compare shifted-grid counts and explain the finite-grid difference.
College / independent study
Compare depths and offsets, justify scale selection and report residuals or uncertainty. A new analysis must be distinguished from the supplied example.

Suggested assessment

For each criterion, use 0 = absent, 1 = partly explained, 2 = clear and supported. Maximum 8 points; adapt before assigning.

Method
The rule, grid and alignment are sufficiently clear for another learner to repeat.
Evidence
Counts, calculations and any supplied data are traceable and labeled.
Communication
The table, figure and explanation agree; axes and units or scale are clear.
Interpretation
The conclusion stays within the evidence and identifies a limitation or useful next check.

Use a short feedback session before the final version.

Credit and reuse

This assignment’s original instructions and rubric are offered by SME under CC BY 4.0. Credit “SME, Box counting: investigate a pattern, version 1 (2026)” and identify changes. Linked materials retain their own source and license information.

Prepare your adapted teaching resource or learner’s project. Publishing a student’s work requires its own permissions.